Episode 8 — Delivery Approaches: Predictive, Agile, Hybrid
Risk practice changes with cadence, so we compare predictive, Agile, and hybrid approaches through the lens of artifacts, timing, and decision rights. In predictive environments, planning intensity is front-loaded, thresholds are often formal, and change control is a primary touchpoint for risk moves. In Agile settings, identification is continuous, indicators are embedded in iteration reviews, and ownership sits closer to the team. Hybrids blend gated decisions with iterative discovery, demanding explicit handoffs so information flows between governance cycles and sprint rhythms. The exam frequently tests whether you can pick the approach-consistent action, not a generic best practice.
We illustrate with examples: shifting a high-uncertainty requirement to a spike in Agile to reduce exposure quickly, or locking contingency in predictive schedules to protect critical path. Best practices include aligning triggers to iteration reviews, mapping risks to epics and releases, and integrating response tasks into backlogs or baselines so accountability is visible. Troubleshooting guidance covers hybrid failure modes—gaps between stage gates and sprints, duplicated registers, and unclear escalation paths. When you see a scenario, anchor your choice in the delivery cadence, governance level, and artifact the stem references. Produced by BareMetalCyber.com, where you’ll find more cyber audio courses, books, and information to strengthen your educational path. Also, if you want to stay up to date with the latest news, visit DailyCyber.News for a newsletter you can use, and a daily podcast you can commute with.
